From the highest office in the
land to the average consumer, everyone seems interested
in high-speed, wireless Internet access. Even the United
States government has deemed this topic important. It is
now proposing the construction of base-station towers on
federal land. The government feels that this move will
help promote the availability of wireless broadband.
Echoing this enthusiasm, the FCC Chairman recently noted
that wireless could be the "Holy Grail" for U.S.
broadband policy. He went on to say that it could be the
third "wire" into homes next to cable and telephone
lines—that is, digital subscriber line (DSL). On the
consumer side, rural users as well as small-business
owners have shown renewed interest in high-speed
Internet connections through a number of different
broadband mechanisms.
What exactly is wireless
broadband? The answer depends on whom you ask—be it
Internet carriers, cellular-network providers, device
manufacturers, or consumers. Not surprisingly, this
confusion over the term's meaning has led to a variety
of misunderstandings. But fear not: These myths will
soon be clarified.
Myth #1:
"Broadband" means cable or DSL.
This statement is partially true. Most Americans access
the Internet through wired connections like broadband
cable or telephone-line DSL. But wireless technology is
playing an increasingly important part in
broadband-Internet access—especially in the global
market. In an annual study of Internet trends by Ipsos-Insight
(www.ipsos-insight.com), the wireless Internet
experienced an increase in usage of 145%. That rise
represents 79 million unique users. The study was based
on interviews in 13 key global markets with more than
7000 adults. It included any type of wireless-Internet
device and access technologies that span both range and
spectrum. Such technologies include Ultra Wideband (UWB),
Wi-Fi, WiMAX, and 3G cellular networks (see
table).
Because the word "broadband" is
overused, everyone believes that they know what it
represents. Part of the problem is that this term has
been around for some time. Perhaps one of the earliest
usages of the term "broadband" was in a 1964 report on
Bell Systems, notes Jeff Hearon, Managing Director of
Global Broadband Strategies (project-mbo.blogspot.com).
This report explained how carrier
systems—signal-modulation technologies—were first
introduced in the Bell System in 1918. Broadband
carriers began appearing in 1940.
During those early days of
carrier-modulation technology, it became apparent that
bandwidth could be divided into categories of
narrowband, wideband, and broadband. Aside from a higher
data-throughput capability, a broadband-communication
medium had one other defining characteristic: It could
be divided into multiple segments. This differentiator
would become critical in future technologies like WiMAX.
Myth #2:
Wireless broadband is the same as WiMAX.
At up to 75 Mbps, WiMAX technology will provide the
highest throughput rate of other broadband connections.
Yet it is still only one of several broadband
technologies. For now, WiMAX is seen as the solution to
many of the first-mile/last-mile issues. For example, it
will allow a high-throughput Internet connection to
locations that lack cable or DSL networks. It also may
be used to connect Wi-Fi hot spots while providing both
backhaul for cellular networks and enterprise-level
connectivity for businesses (see
figure). When the
government and the FCC Chairman speak of wireless
broadband, they are referring to a
wireless-metropolitan-area-network (WMAN) technology
like WiMAX. But what exactly is WiMAX?
WiMAX is derived from the IEEE
802.16 air-interface specification. That standard
focuses on the efficient use of bandwidth between 10 and
66 GHz. It also defines a medium-access-control (MAC)
layer for that spectrum. A technology that is built
around 802.16a can be implemented in either a
fixed-wireless (non-line-of-sight) or mobile fashion.
Just as Wi-Fi is a moniker for
802.11, WiMAX is the nickname for 802.16a. Wi-Fi is
designed to provide broadband connectivity inside
buildings. In contrast, WiMAX will transfer data around
75 Mbps over a distance of 30 miles (48 km) to thousands
of users from a single base station.
The goal of the WiMAX Forum (www.wimaxforum.org)
is to promote the deployment of
broadband-wireless-access networks. This nonprofit
corporation plans to do for 802.16 what the Wi-Fi
alliance has done for 802.11 in terms of product
certification, standard compliance, and marketing.
Myth #3:
WiMAX will be the next Wi-Fi.
The above statement may be true in terms of the
technology evolution that will complete the connection
of every potential user to the broadband Internet. In
general, however, WiMAX and Wi-Fi are complementary
rather than competitive technologies. According to Nigel
Ballard, Wireless Director for Matrix Networks (www.mtrx.com),
"You need the backhaul before you can provide the Wi-Fi
service locally." Backhauling to the Internet backbone
provides the essential connection to the World Wide Web.
As WiMAX products emerge and
become more cost efficient, they may compete with
existing Internet-access mechanisms like T1/E1, the
broadband cable modem, and DSL, explains George Wu,
Director of Marketing for Fujitsu Microelectronics
America, Inc. (www.fma.fujitsu.com). Yet Wu also notes
that the main purpose of WiMAX is to extend the
Internet's reach to rural areas that currently have only
traditional dial-up connections.
Joe English, Director of
Broadband Marketing at Intel, explains that one of the
key differences between WiMAX and Wi-Fi is the way that
the bandwidth is apportioned. "WiMAX is a grant-request
system, whereas Wi-Fi is like Ethernet (i.e., it is all
shared bandwidth on a segment)." English points out that
WiMAX can be apportioned down into much smaller chunks:
"So if you want to, you could provide a lot of bandwidth
to someone like an enterprise (e.g., a 20-Mb
connection)." Similarly, you could backhaul a hot spot
or perform some other point-to-point transmission.
This ability to do
point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connections
allows WiMAX to serve as a bridge to both small urban
businesses and rural areas. Cable may run right next to
many small-to-medium-sized businesses (SMBs). But
regulatory issues may make it difficult to access that
cable. In addition, digging up the streets to gain wired
access may be cost-prohibitive. In contrast, companies
like VeriLAN (www.verilan.com) enable an enterprise
metropolitan wireless backbone with 802.16a-like
technology. This company provides a non-line-of-sight (NLOS)
wireless service using pre-standard, 802.16a-like gear.
Myth #4:
Wireless broadband is limited to Wi-Fi for now.
For the majority of users in the U.S., this fact is a
reality. Deployments of other wireless technologies for
Internet access are just beginning to surface. On the
cellular-network front, for example, Verizon Wireless (www.verizonwireless.com)
is in the process of completing its broadband-access
technology. The technology is known as Evolution Data
Only or simply EV-DO. Verizon plans to phase in the EV-DO
service across most of the U.S. by 2005. Bill Stone, VP
of Marketing for Verizon Wireless, notes that EV-DO may
complement current Wi-Fi deployments in homes, on
campuses, and for businesses.
3G-like services that resemble
Verizon's EV-DO will be great for on-the-go scenarios.
But consumers may still find it hard to beat the higher
throughput afforded by WiMAX-based Internet access. When
will WiMAX technology be readily available? According to
Intel's Joe English, WiMAX will roll out in three
different phases. Fixed-wireless devices, which utilize
an outdoor antenna, will dominate the first phase. That
phase will start at the beginning of next year.
Toward the end of 2005, there
will be more indoor installations. They will resemble
today's Wi-Fi access points. In the 2006 timeframe, the
third phase will emerge. At that point, laptop computers
will come integrated with WiMAX chips and antennas. In
fact, laptops will have both Wi-Fi and WiMAX radios.
While global users may access
the Internet in many different ways, the growth of
wireless-broadband Internet access seems assured. For a
listing of all of the contributions from which this
article is derived, please visit Wireless Systems
Design's forum page at www.planetee.com/Forums.
Figure 1
Table 1
|
COMPARISONS OF VARIOUS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES |
|
|
UWB |
Bluetooth |
Wi-Fi |
WiMAX |
WiMAX |
CDMA2000/
1xEV-DO |
|
Standard |
802.15.3a |
802.15.1 |
802.11a/b/g |
802.16d |
802.16e |
3G |
|
Usage |
WPAN |
WPAN |
WLAN |
WMAN (fixed) |
WMAN (portable) |
WWAN |
|
Throughput |
110 to 480 Mbps |
Up to 720 kbps |
Up to 54 Mbps |
Up to 75 Mbps (20-MHz BW) |
Up to 30 Mbps (10-MHz BW) |
Up to 2.4 Mbps (typically 300 to 600 kbps) |
|
Range |
Up to 30 ft. |
Up to 30 ft. |
Up to 300 ft. |
Typically 4 to 6 miles |
Typically 1 to 3 miles |
Typically 1 to 5 miles |
|
Frequency |
7.5 GHz |
2.4 GHz |
2.4 GHz, 5 GHz |
Sub-11 GHz |
2 to 6 GHz |
400, 800, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2100 MHz |
Copyright © 2004 Penton Media,
Inc., All rights reserved.