
The drive for teleworking
07/23/07
By Trudy Walsh,
More feds work from home, but technical, cultural
resistance remains
In the summer of
2004, the General Services Administration’s regional center
in Boston was closed for nearly a week. GSA officials
couldn’t blame the shutdown on anthrax, bird flu or
terrorists.

They had no one to blame but Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.).

The Democratic National Convention was held in the building
next door, and the Secret Service had declared the
convention a national security event. Every federal employee
who worked at the center was required to work somewhere else
that week.

Fortunately, the GSA center had been developing a telework
plan since 1999. The Desktop 2000 plan is centered on a
virtual connection from Citrix Systems. With Citrix
MetaFrame installed in the office’s data center, GSA
employees can launch applications via the Web. Every user —
at every level — is issued a laptop PC.

Because the center had prepared for the prospect of every
employee working off-site, the office got through convention
week with no downtime. Today a majority of employees
telework, even with no emergency, and anyone who needs or
wants to telework can, said Jim LeVerso, GSA’s New England
regional information technology manager.

But few other agencies share GSA’s enthusiasm for the
virtual worker. According to a March study by CDW-Government,
more than half of federal employees are eligible to telework,
compared with fewer than 16 percent of those in the private
sector. Yet not many avail themselves of the opportunity.
Last month, the Office of Personnel Management reported to
Congress that only 9.5 percent of the 1.2 million employees
eligible to telework do so at least once a month.

But the whole idea that an employee has to report to a
specific geographic location to perform work is completely
changing, thanks to technology. After all, as Nigel Ballard,
government marketing manager at Intel said, “Work is
something you do, not someplace you go.”

Two sides, one coin
One morning, a government employee turns on CNN as she’s
taking a last sip of coffee before heading to work. She sees
police wrapping hazmat tape around an office building that
looks vaguely familiar. Then she realizes it’s her office.
If her agency has a telework plan in place, she can fire up
her laptop and work from home, missing nary a beat, Ballard
said.

Telework can cut rush-hour traffic congestion in major
cities. It can improve workers’ morale. It can help the
environment. But perhaps one of the best arguments for
telework is that — as GSA found — it is essential for
continuity-of-operations planning.

“Back then, we were just talking about working off-site,”
LeVerso said of Desktop 2000. “The heart and soul of the
solution revolved around the concept of teleworking and had
no real bearing on our fledgling COOP program at that time.”

Yet the ability to work remotely became the cornerstone of
the center’s disaster response plan. “We learned very early
on that COOP is telework,” LeVerso said.

COOP plans are necessary even if the Big One never comes.
All it took, for example, to bring the nation’s capital to
its knees for two days in March 2003 was an angry tobacco
farmer and a tractor. Dwight Watson, a farmer from North
Carolina, drove a tractor into a shallow pool near the
Vietnam Veterans Memorial.

Washington’s usual traffic crawl became a nightmare as
police tried to come to a peaceful resolution with Watson,
who claimed to have explosives, although none were ever
found.

Technology roadblocks
So why the reluctance to telework? Some say it’s the lack of
technology, and others say it is the lack of progressive
thinking on the part of management or even the employees
themselves.

Certainly technology — or lack of the latest technology —
does play a crucial role. Agencies haven’t yet adopted the
technologies that would make telework as effective as
showing up every day at the office, the argument goes.

That is the position of the Telework Consortium, a nonprofit
group established in 2002 under a grant from the National
Institute of Standards and Technology.

“We realized that unless telecommunications and computer
technologies could support it, teleworking wouldn’t happen,”
said Bill Mularie, chief executive officer of the
consortium.

When Mularie began studying telework and why it’s not more
popular, the dominant view — expressed by OPM and others —
was that it was all management’s fault. “Not true,” Mularie
said. “If technology doesn’t allow you to call a meeting at
a moment’s notice — or create a sort of water cooler effect
— it’s not replicating the work environment.”

Lack of good home Internet connectivity also can hamper
telework. In a recent study of 30 developed countries, the
U.S. ranked 15th in the percentage of homes with broadband
connections to the Internet. “And we’re slipping,” Mularie
said. Another bump in the road to telework for all eligible
federal workers is the fear that computer troubles will slow
teleworkers. Certain elements of office life can be
replicated in a telework scenario. Instant messaging can
replace co-worker banter; videoconferencing can supply a
sense of face-to-face contact. But where’s the help-desk guy
when your laptop crashes?

Johnathon Cervelli, product marketing manager at Blue Coat
Systems, also sees technology as the main impediment to
greater use of telework by feds.

“You would think once you had [virtual private network]
connectivity, you’re good to go,” Cervelli said. But that’s
not always the case. “A lot of applications use protocols
that respond very badly to the kind of latency we find in
long-distance networks.” This latency can slow network
performance to the point where it could take a few minutes
to open a file. “That makes it hard to have a collaborative
experience.”

Personal roadblocks
Still, personal perception — at both the management and
employee levels — plays a role in the sluggish adoption of
telework. The major roadblock is fear of the unknown, said
Joel Brunson, president of Tandberg Federal. “If you can’t
see an employee, are they really working?”

According to the latest OPM telework survey, available at
www.telework.gov, there’s still too much of an “if you’re
not in the office, you’re not working” mentality: About 54
percent of federal employees surveyed identified
organizational culture as the greatest barrier.

Management wants the same productivity from teleworkers as
if they were working in the office. And is that so wrong?

Managers need to be educated about the value of telework,
said Pierre Monacelli, senior vice president of project
management leadership at Robbins-Gioia. They need to treat
it with more seriousness. “It’s not just setting up somebody
at home with a laptop,” he said. Managers with strong
management skills usually don’t have a problem with telework,
Monacelli said.

Too often, management fears a loss of control when employees
telework. Many managers still have the “mind-set of a 1950s
movie, where the manager is looking out at a sea of people
sitting at typewriters,” all under his scrutiny, Ballard
said.

Managers are going to have to be completely re-educated,
said Bobby Caudill, group manager of global government
solutions at Adobe Systems. They will have to move away from
the management-by-wandering-around style to a
pay-for-performance model. Even employees can fear
teleworking. Some people shun telework because they fear a
loss of banter and camaraderie with colleagues — although
perhaps an equal number welcome freedom from distracting
office chatter.

But with the right technology — instant messaging, cell
phones, e-mail, even videoconferencing equipment — people
can stay connected. “You can still bridge that same sort of
workplace environment,” he said. “People are afraid [that]
if they don’t go into the office every day, they’ll lose out
somehow.”

Telework is not for everyone, Mularie said. Nonetheless, he
insists that many fears about telework tend to be
unjustified. “This thing we call the workplace is left over
from the Industrial Revolution and the assembly line.”

Putting it together
Despite the many obstacles, some agencies such as the Food
and Drug Administration have embraced the concept of
telework.

Since the 1990s, FDA has moved toward a greater use of
telework as the technology has evolved, said Ginger Leo,
FDA’s acting deputy chief information officer. The agency
supplies teleworkers with laptops to work from home or at
satellite offices.

As a result, telework has become a way of life for many
agency employees, Leo said. It’s one of the ways the agency
helps employees balance work and family, and it has become
one of FDA’s recruitment tools, she said.

FDA has developed a one-stop IT shop that can also function
as a remote help desk. The Employee Resource and Information
Center is on duty to answer employee help-desk calls at the
office, at home or on the road via phone or e-mail.

And because security is a concern whenever government
equipment — especially laptops that can cost $1,500 or so —
are taken off-site, FDA uses tokens, passwords, encryption
and other network security measures to keep track of its
hardware.

Leo’s own experience as a teleworker has been positive.
“When I participated, I found it easier to not have the
interruptions of the office,” she said. “I could focus on my
specific task, to review a lot of proposals. I could think
alone without having people stopping by.”
Collaboration tools, online processes can help re-create the
office experience

As the number of teleworkers grows, feds are taking
advantage of some videoconferencing and network technologies
to help make the commute from the bed to the laptop PC in
the den a little easier.

The Food and Drug Administration, for example, implemented a
Cisco Systems collaboration suite for 10,000 researchers and
scientists. They can access a secure virtual private network
using a Cisco suite that includes unified messaging and
voice over IP.

Cisco representatives say collaborative technology can keep
important work relationships viable in a telecommuting
environment. Telework will expand through tools such as
Cisco’s TelePresence, which uses high-definition video
technology, said Bruce Klein, vice president at Cisco
Federal.

“You’ll feel like you’re sitting in the same room with
someone, even though he’s in Hong Kong,” said Chris
Shenefiel, industry solution manager at Cisco’s worldwide
federal government division. The oft-cited wish of managers
to be able to see their teleworking employees is now
possible, albeit at a considerable price.

Telework and continuity of operations really do go
hand-in-hand, said Greg McDermott, director of federal
initiatives at Marathon Technologies. Telework and COOP
policies are “not just for when the Big One comes, but we
also need to be ready for simple displacing events.”

“Government has done a great job of protecting essential
systems from a major disaster such as Hurricane Katrina,”
said Steve Keilen, Marathon’s marketing director. “But no
one has cracked the code on the things that really cause
outages on a day-to-day basis. And these things need to be
considered in a COOP plan.”

Marathon’s everRun software is used in federal applications
that require a high-availability architecture and 100
percent redundancy, such as aviation systems.

EverRun synchronizes two standard Windows servers. The
software creates a single Windows environment that operates
like a stand-alone server. “If there’s a disk drive that
fails or reaches over-capacity, the system will continue to
operate with no disruption of service,” Keilen said.

EverRun also is part of a congressional threat alert system.
Congressional leaders have buttons under their desk that
they can push if they feel threatened, McDermott said.

To enable more telework, some agencies, including the
Internal Revenue Service and the Homeland Security
Department, are adopting a 90/10 work paradigm, said Nigel
Ballard, government marketing manager at Intel. Ninety
percent of employees receive laptops, 10 percent get
desktops.

The days when an agency had backup systems in a locked room
off-site are over, Ballard said. Nobody ever checks on the
room, “the batteries go flat and nobody remembers the
passwords.” Better to have a highly mobile workforce
equipped with laptops that contain robust security features.

Teleworkers should be able to have the same experience they
have at the office, whether they are working from home, a
hotel room or a satellite center, said Tom Simmons, federal
area vice president at Citrix Systems.

General Services Administration employees access their
network using Citrix Presentation Server every workday,
Simmons said. If an event triggers the agency’s COOP plan,
and users have to connect from home, there’s no spike in
license demand. Users can get to their data from anywhere
they have access to a remote connection. “All I need is a
keyboard, a monitor and a dial-up connection, and I can log
in to any application,” Simmons said.

Government has little choice but to embrace telework,
Simmons said. The generation coming into the federal
workforce posted their college papers online and checked
class schedules and assignments on Web sites. “Their whole
world is an on-demand thing,” he said. “They access the
Internet at Starbucks and on the beach.”

Bobby Caudill, group manger for global government solutions
at Adobe, thinks part of government’s lack of mobility is
its addiction to paper.

Caudill uses the example of a travel request. “That’s been
done in paper and pencil for years.” But by extending that
document online and eliminating the paper, the whole
geography of the process changes. No need to traipse back to
the office to get a supervisor’s signature. “Once you’ve
eliminated paper, you’ve made your environment friendly to
teleworkers.”

Removed from the umbilical cord of the help desk, some
teleworkers fear they will encounter computer problems that
they won’t be able to handle.

Adobe’s Connect Web communication tool is one solution to
this, Caudill said. Connect lets a help-desk employee take
over someone’s desktop remotely. Face-to-face meetings over
Connect reduce the sense of isolation some employees might
feel. Videoconferencing and online collaboration tools are
the keys to pulling government through a COOP event, Caudill
said. “In the case of a pandemic flu, the last thing you
want to do is bring everybody together.”
Who telecommutes?
Last month, the Office of Personnel
Management released its annual report to Congress on the
status of telework in the federal government (to read the
full report, go to GCN.com, Quickfind 809).

Fifty-two agencies, covering 1,802,032 employees, responded
to OPM’s survey. Of that total, 1,253,509 are eligible to
telework, and 119,248 telework at least one day a month.
That’s 9.5 percent of the number of eligible workers; 6.6
percent of the total population covered in the survey. The
survey included some very small agencies — such as the
Japan-U.S. Friendship Commission, with a total population of
four. The list below covers agencies with at least 1,000
employees eligible for teleworking.


Top Five
|
Agency |
Eligible
Employees |
% of
Eligible
Teleworking |
| EEOC |
1,838 |
41.6 |
| Commerce |
33,689 |
34.1 |
|
Education |
4,282 |
33.4 |
| SEC |
3,820 |
28.7 |
| SSA |
16,103 |
24.3 |

Bottom
Five
|
Agency |
Eligible
Employees |
% of
Eligible
Teleworking |
| FTC |
1,200 |
1.7 |
Homeland
Security |
50,999 |
1.9 |
| SBA |
6,087 |
2.2 |
| Justice |
61,932 |
2.9 |
| Energy |
12,002 |
3.3 |

© 1996-2007 1105
Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|